Friday, January 20, 2012

The pin drop heard round the world

Earthquakes!  Tornadoes!  Tsunamis!  Diseases!  Famines! 

Every night you sit down and watch the world news there is no escape from hearing more and more about terrible things going on in the world.  Is it really that bad out there?  Have things gotten out of control?  Have we really screwed up this world that these things are happening?  I don't think so.

Let us go back in time to the 1500's.  Easter Island was at it's peak with about 7000 inhabitants.  By the time anyone ever found this place, it was 200 years later and the society had diminished to a few hundred.  It took settlers over 200 years to find these people, but now we can see everything going on around the world at a moments notice via satellite.  The advent of the internet in the 1980's only helped narrow the access time to next to nothing by allowing all information to be accessible almost instantly.  Now think, that society existed for 100 years before anyone discovered them, how many different disasters have we missed as well?  We did not have hundreds of weather stations or instruments of any kind of real accuracy.  We didn't have the variety of measurements either.

In the last 40 to 50 years, we have been able to take measurements with an increasing amount of accuracy.  This leads to a much better understanding of current trends, but does nothing with providing any details as to what happens in the past.  There is an old adage that says "if a tree falls in the woods, and no one heard it, did actually happen?"  I think that holds well in this situation, that there are many many more people now than there ever was in the past.  More people to see, record, tell their friends about, any kind of thing is now being witnessed and recorded.  The USGS website, in relation to whether or not there are more earthquakes now, "A partial explanation may lie in the fact that in the last twenty years, we have definitely had an increase in the number of earthquakes we have been able to locate each year. This is because of the tremendous increase in the number of seismograph stations in the world and the many improvements in global communications. In 1931, there were about 350 stations operating in the world; today, there are more than 8,000 stations..."  This relates directly to many of the recorded graphs in the Millennium Assessment that they either go back only about 60 years or so, or the technology upon with those recording were recorded from were very inaccurate or poor, as well as limited in number. 

So as with many things, there really isn't anything new under the sun.

6 comments:

  1. Hi, Josh;
    Your blog makes a compelling point and addresses the media's tendency to control individual perceptions and neglect a longitudinal approach. Your blog is well written and persuasive. I do think this could be strengthened with a better incorporation of examples and points made by the two readings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, I will work on integration of the examples more next time.

      Delete
  2. Hi Josh. Your post is interesting. On clarification, you do not believe a major environmental situation is upon the world? Your argument fails to address the depletion of major natural resources and the projected consumption of a peak world population. Do you believe the Earth, as Easter Island, has a finite amount of resources or do you see the environment able to adapt to human occupancy? Looking forward to blogging with you and hearing your opinions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry for not having a strong thesis statement of any kind. I am responding to the SECOND question: Are the environmental problems we face today new?

      Delete
    2. Your argument is that they are not new. That was my argument as well, expect we back it up differently. To clarify my original question, do you believe the environmental problems we face today are of a new scale? Do you believe it requires immediate attention to prohibit further degradation in order to sustain human life on Earth?

      Delete
  3. Hi Josh,
    Your post addresses a lot of issues I believe, but fails to really narrow down to a few main points. Consequently, it is a little confusing to follow. Also, you might want to watch your grammar as there are a few areas that are grammatically incorrect. Other than that you do bring up some interesting points and have the evidence to back it up.

    ReplyDelete